Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

How the Web Is Changing the Practice of Law

Just like with many other professions and disciplines that require intellectual engagement, the legal profession has been transformed by the World Wide Web and other advances in Internet technology. One of the influential aspects of the Information Age seems to be the ability of the Internet to advance the construct of a global village by eliminating geographical limitations and boundaries. The utopian concept of a global village does not always seem to translate well into the jurisdictional structure of legal practice, particularly in a common law system like the United States.

The Disruptive Consequence of Empowering Non-Lawyers

Dissemination of legal information is something that the Internet seems to do too well. The World Wide Web has become a treasure trove of legal information, free for the entire world to seek and enjoy. Legal information such as laws, statutes and rules have always been meant to be freely available to the public, yet publishers of legal information and education found a way to profit from this democratic ideal by publishing bodies of law and rule making, sometimes with annotations, for many years. The same can be said of court decisions and transcripts of hearings, as case law reporters like West Publishing profited by applying taxonomy and case digest indexing.

Enter the Legal Information Institute (LII) at Cornell Law School, the Commonwealth LII, and the Free Access to Law Movement (FALM) international collectives. These noble organizations advocate open and free access to legal information and resources around the world. Such initiatives have been the bane for many attorneys who in the past relied on their ability to access legal information and knowledge for clients. It could be argued that the information that FALM seeks to empower humanity with has always been available from courthouses and law libraries, but it doesn’t take away from the fact that many legal practices have seen their flow of clients diminished. The way many people see it, FALM is simply a self-help legal resource.

The ambitious efforts of FALM are disruptive in the sense that it focuses too much on the principles of open access and the marvels of Internet technology that, but not enough on the fact that the philosophical underpinnings of legal information are normally not within the purview of a layperson. For example, the members of a charity organization that is stripped from federal funding because the government believes it is religious could file a lawsuit to recover funding, but the case could quickly turn constitutional due to religion being involved. It is not reasonable for an average citizen to read, understand and apply matters regarding the Establishment Clause and the complex nature of landmark cases such as Lemon v. Kurtzman.

The True Value of Online Legal Forms

Transactional attorneys have been wrongly maligned by the wide availability of web sites that peddle online legal forms for either very little or nothing. The early incarnations of these web sites were crude operations that essentially sold forms commonly used in civil or family matters such as real estate closings and divorces. Business was brisk and profitable in those days, as there was little competition. These days, many of these sites offer legal forms for free and even minimize the role of transactional attorneys by insinuating to clients that all these lawyers do is fill out blank forms.

Many web sites dedicated to the free or low-cost distribution of online legal forms are owned and operated by attorneys who end up offering their services to clients who in the beginning were only interested in legal forms.

It is preposterous to think that FALM and online legal forms will be the demise of one of the most honorable and significant professions. The only attorneys affected by the Internet are those who fail to grasp the endless business opportunities it provides. There is a lot that lawyers can learn from the Internet, but only if they take the time to educate themselves. Quite a few Online Continuing Legal Education (CLE) courses and seminars deal with subjects related to the use of social media, Internet marketing and online branding. Staying competitive in the Information Age is a matter of being informed.

Cathy Sanders is an attorney, web designer and content contributor for Top Web Design Schools, a site exploring the industry’s various degrees and ranking of the top online schools for web design.

Share the Post:

Related Posts